The 29th COP which was a major climate change meeting ended with a new global climate finance target of $1.3 trillion per year by 2035, upping the ante on the climate emergency. But India categorically rejected the financial deal saying that it is inadequate and unimplementable to address issues emanating from climate change. Speaking for India, tackling the climate crisis was seen as a failure because it did not promote minimizing the use of fossil fuels, which are the source of the problem. Other issues of Indian climate change negotiators also count the operational opacity of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It has turned into one of the significant aspects of the present climate affairs 2024 map of India showing population young politicians actively participating in climate negotiations.
They named the proposed financial package of $ one point three trillion as ‘’ an optical illusion’’, arguing that it was glossy but lacked substance alongside appropriate policymakers’ commitment and entertainment tools. Expectations that the deal would inject US$ 100 billion into the developed nations’ economies were labelled as contingent and shot through with texts of written commitments that developing nations had signed. Delegates also pointed out that such proposals do not take to account the role of developed countries and the commitments they failed to fulfill in past COP meetings. India, in the closing plenary, was especially insistent on calling for practical interventions over fashionable funding.
This fund was expected to come mainly from developed countries which pledged a floor of $300 billion annually towards meeting the larger climate change finance targets. However, countries such as Nigeria reiterated India’s concern by citing failure to meet the financial obligations agreed to under previous COPs. This persists the lack of trust between developed and developing countries in relation to climate finance and a fair share of burden.
COP29 can be considered a success in spite of disputes and reached the critical point of the general recognition of UN-approved carbon markets. This mechanism is intended to assist the countries in achieving their climate targets because it involves the exchange of carbon credits. Although laudable, India pointed out that these carbon markets cannot solve all problems facing climate change; a simultaneous effort has to be made to reduce carbon fossil emissions.
This is the reason India has said ‘no’ to the COP29 deal, stressing that it wants fair treatment and non- discrimination while receiving Climate change pledges. This issue of climate finance,floating carbon markets and the place of developed countries gives it important environmental current affairs for SSC and UPSC examinations. It reveals the further polarization of countries on the climate responsibilities and an existence of the imperative for fair solutions that has been felt by the developed nations.
The COP29 negotiations can be observed as the continuous work on the advancement in the fight against climate change. India’s position is clear: what is needed is actual commitments on actions rather than mere ‘Aspirational’ financial pledges – it has now resumed the leadership of the developing world. Payments made by rich countries for protection against climate change remain close to current affairs 2024 to gain knowledge about climate change diplomacy and sustainable development.
Chat With Us